Reformation 500 WEEK 9 the Anabaptists
Conrad Grebel, a prominent member of the
church in Zurich, “had been led to the evangelical faith by Zwingli and
heartily approved his work of reformation” (Kuiper, 204-205). But soon he and
others of like mind felt that both Zwingli and Luther’s reform movements had
not gone far enough. They were not satisfied with separation from catholic
corruptions; they wanted separation from all the ungodly.
These radical reformers felt that the root
cause of all the corruption in the Church was the compromising State-Church
bond that had existed since the days of Constantine, where every citizen was
born and baptized as a member of both church and state. This “brought much of
the world into the Church” (Kuiper, 205), and allowed too much State
interference. “The churches looked to the state for salary and support.
Official Protestantism seemed to differ little from official Catholicism”
(Bruce Shelley, Ch. History in Plain Language, 249). “In Zwingli’s
Zurich, the Council of Government had the final word in religious matters”
(Gonzalez, 70).
Zwingli’s critics argued that Scripture
requires true believers to be separate from the ungodly world; and therefore, a
Christian “should not hold government office because this involved ‘the use of
the sword,’ should not be a soldier, should not take an oath, and should not
sue in the courts” (Kuiper, 206). The disciples in Jerusalem knew nothing of a
state-church alliance, but rather they “left the synagogue and the world,
gathered in an upper room, sold their goods, and held all things in common”
(Schaff, 8:75). Apostolic churches were composed only of heartfelt believers,
baptized only after a public commitment to live for Christ. Thus, “infant
baptism must be rejected, for it takes for granted that one becomes a Christian
by being born into a supposedly Christian society” (Gonzalez, 67-68).
In the fall of 1524, when Grebel’s wife
gave birth to a son, the Grebels refused to baptize their baby. To deal with
the crisis, the City Council of Zurich arranged a public debate on January 17,
1525. Zwingli defended infant baptism as a sign of the covenant, replacing the
old sign of circumcision (Col. 2:11). He also appealed to 1 Cor. 7.14 and to
the NT examples of family baptisms. “Bullinger, who was present at the
disputation, reports that the Anabaptists were unable to refute Zwingli’s
arguments” (Schaff, 8:81). The Council agreed and “warned all parents who had
neglected to have their children baptized to do so within a week or face
banishment from Zurich” (Shelley, 250).
“George Blaurock, a former priest, stepped
over to Conrad Grebel and asked him for baptism in the apostolic fashion – upon
confession of personal faith in Jesus Christ. Grebel baptized him on the spot and
Blaurock proceeded to baptize the others” (Shelley, 247). Thus, Anabaptism was
born. They rejected the name Anabaptists (“re-baptizers”) because they
never considered their infant baptism a real baptism.
We will meet the Anabaptists again, but to
sum up for now: “The Reformers attempted to reform the old Church by the Bible;
the Radicals attempted to build a new Church from the Bible.” They “went
directly to the apostolic age, and ignored the intervening centuries as
apostasy…. Nothing is more characteristic of radicalism…than an utter lack of
historical sense and respect for the past” (Schaff, 8:71).
NOTE: These Posts were written and designed as bulletin inserts by Pastor David Fagrey of the Grace Reformed Church of Rapid City, SD .
Link to this blog entry as a bulletin insert: Reformation500 The Anabaptists
For a double-sided PDF for easy printing: Reformation 500 Week 9
Link to this blog entry as a bulletin insert: Reformation500 The Anabaptists
For a double-sided PDF for easy printing: Reformation 500 Week 9
Official Seal of the RCUS |
This is the seal of the Reformed Church of the United States (RCUS). As you can see its history goes back to 1748, when the RCUS began. We celebrate with the 500th Anniversary of the Reformation we praise God for what is probably the most amazing spiritual revival in the history of the world.
No comments:
Post a Comment